What is the difference between a library management system and a knowledge management system?
There is no such thing as a stupid question. Understanding the basics is crucial for making informed decisions about what is best for our firms, universities and companies. Much has changed in information and knowledge management over the past few years, so let’s revisit some key principles.
The following post explores the differences between Library Management Systems (LMS) and Knowledge Management Systems (KMS), highlighting some of their features, their purpose and applications. It concludes with some thoughts about how GenAI and other technical developments might impact organisational systems.
Some definitions and key features to get us started:
What is a Library Management System (LMS)
A library management system is designed to manage the resources of a library collection. It handles tasks such as cataloguing, circulations, lending, acquisitions, and user management, ensuring that library operations run smoothly and efficiently. It might automate certain processes, freeing up library staff to focus on other value-added tasks.
Key Features: Core features include cataloguing, serials management, loans and circulation, acquisitions and budget/financial management, as well as end-user management.
Use Cases: LMS are commonly used in public libraries, academic libraries, community and special libraries, facilitating easy access to resources for all users. There is usually an easy-to-use online version (OPAC) for practitioners, staff, members, students, and other types of end users.
What is a Knowledge Management System (KMS)
Broadly speaking, knowledge management integrates people, processes, content, culture, and technology to convert tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge that can be accessed and used by others. According to IBM, a knowledge management system (KMS) harnesses and encompasses the collective knowledge of the organisation. In addition to published resources in the library catalogue, this could include documents accessed via a document management system, in shared network folders, or other repositories. Typical examples include precedents, staff handbooks, model forms, guides and other useful information about how work is carried out across the organisation.
Key Features: Key features include meta data about knowledge documents, collaboration tools, integration with document management systems, workflow automation as well as end-user management.
Use Cases: KMS is used in various settings, such as corporate environments, research institutions, and consultancy firms, to promote knowledge sharing and encourage innovation.
Let’s compare LMS and KMS
Here are some points of comparison which make distinctions between “traditional” library catalogues and the more sophisticated knowledge and research solutions that you will find in law firms:
- Core functions: LMS focuses on the management of published library resources, while KMS is centred on capturing and sharing unpublished organisational knowledge.
- Data and content management: LMS deals with physical and digital library resources, whereas KMS manages both explicit and tacit knowledge within an organisation.
- User engagement and interaction: LMS provides users with access to library resources, while KMS facilitates collaboration and knowledge sharing among people.
- Integration and interoperability: LMS integrates with bibliographic tools and supplier databases, library catalogues and user management systems. KMS integrates with various organisational systems, including the firm’s network folders, the document management system, and other business process tools.
In short, library and research services provide end users with access to information and knowledge. As a legal or health professional, you then take that information and analyse it. You might read and learn from the text to make informed decisions, create a new document for a client matter, or compile a report or presentation.
In addition, you will want your KMS to capture and store expert commentary and specialist knowledge for future reference. As mentioned in the IBM definition above, you might store your organisational processes and guides in the system. All of this is tacit knowledge unique to your organisation and continually increases everyone’s understanding of their working environment.
It is also valuable data for your private, in-house GenAI expert systems.
Future Trends and Developments
Why are these differences between the two systems important? For many organisations (law firms, government departments, academic institutions, companies etc) there would be excitement about knowledge management systems. Would they be as excited about a library management system?
In my opinion, information and research professionals need to be re-evaluating their library management systems and need to explore whether it can be more than just a catalogue of published resources. Evaluating whether your LMS can incorporate more knowledge management functionalities is crucial for getting the best value from the systems you may already have.
For example, in law firms, people need quick and easy access to annotated precedents, in-house presentation notes, documents on internal drives – as well as the usual legal textbooks.
A sophisticated system like KnowAll Matrix is designed to unlock organisational knowledge silos, making your information assets searchable and visible. By providing a single place for managing, finding, and sharing knowledge, the system ensures that information is available anywhere, anytime. This capability is vital for organisations that want to provide their practitioners with easy access to relevant information knowledge so they can do their work efficiently.
Technological advancements
Both LMS and KMS are evolving with technological advancements. LMS is increasingly incorporating digital resources and automation, while KMS is leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning to enhance knowledge capture, contextual searching, recommendations and efficient sharing.
Evolving end user and client needs
User needs are changing, with a growing demand for digital access and remote capabilities. There are also possibilities for GenAI document or book abstracting. Both LMS and KMS are adapting to meet these needs, offering mobile access and cloud-based solutions.
Integration of LMS and KMS
If you have two systems, there is potential for integrating LMS and KMS to create a comprehensive management system that combines the strengths of both systems, providing seamless access to library resources AND organisational knowledge.
Conclusion
The question at the top of the post might seem straightforward, however, there is value in exploring the differences between these two types of – related – systems. Understanding the differences between LMS and KMS is essential for information management professionals, and we should also be encouraging our stakeholders to get excited about future possibilities.
A good library management system should play an important role in breaking down silos and ensuring the flow of information around an organisation. While both systems serve distinct purposes, they share the common goal of improving access to information and knowledge. And you may be pleasantly surprised that you can serve both purposes with one system if the required features are in place.
Resources / Further Reading
If you want to find out more about everything discussed above, please visit these resources:
What is Knowledge Management? KM Institute
Explaining Knowledge Management; Its Importance, Use Cases, and Types.” KM Institute
What is knowledge management? IBM Topic
SIGN UP FOR A FREE - 30 DAY TRIAL
Try the powerful and easy-to-use KnowAll Matrix with no obligations, no commitment, no installation
